🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his desire to see opponents probed, applying influence on the Justice Department to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay further, it's damaging our reputation and trustworthiness," the leader wrote recently in a social media post.

"They impeached me, and charged me (5 times!)" he said, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Each have subsequently been indicted, in situations that numerous specialists have stated seem to be politically motivated and challenging to succeed in legal proceedings.

But the most recent allegations against a Trump critic, former security advisor John Bolton, stand apart, legal experts and ex-prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's charges to Comey's is like comparing apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

The Details of the Case

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations pertaining to the supposed improper handling of sensitive materials. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has become a outspoken presidential opponent, even to call him "remarkably ignorant" and unfit for office in his memoir.

Experts contend that while there may be political motivations to go after Bolton, the methods used to obtain an indictment and the proof gathered against him indicate a possibly more substantial case than the DOJ presented against James.

"This misconduct that's being claimed is both more serious and seems to have taken place over a considerable duration," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his tenure as Trump's security advisor, and following his 2019 White House departure, authorities alleged that Bolton placed the nation at risk by improperly retaining and sending classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Some of the documents were marked top secret.

The charge alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user gained access to Bolton's account where files were kept and sent an seeming warning to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on Friday to eighteen distinct counts of mishandling classified information.

Political Motivation or a Strong Case?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the tails of charges against James - has renewed concerns about political pressure on the legal system.

Trump once implied Bolton should be in prison, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, wrote a publication about his experience in the Trump government that was sharply negative of the president.

"There's no question that the timing of this indictment, when combined with additional cases, has raised questions about the strength of these charges, and the reason these charges are being brought now," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he continued, "should the Justice Department is able to prove the facts alleged and demonstrate the information is correctly designated, his conduct may certainly have violated the statute".

Prosecuting such a senior figure for improperly handling sensitive materials is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern classified information present challenges to prosecute, but they can and are filed against both low-level and high-level officials, from time to time," she said.

Similarities to Examinations into Trump and President

Trump similarly faced allegations of wrongfully keeping sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their return, but that matter was eventually dismissed by a federal judge and voided by his re-election as leader.

A independent investigator additionally found that former President Joe Biden improperly maintained classified documents from his time as vice president, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's situation bears similarities to Trump's classified documents matters, said Mr Lesko, who also held a senior security role at the Justice Department.

Rigorous protocols regulate the handling of classified documents. To win a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was sending was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone not entitled to obtain it.

"Due to the sensitive character of the material at question in this case, we don't have a lot of particulars about why the prosecution believes things like the diary entries and the other information he communicated by email, and why there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Prosecution

The procedure by which the Justice Department initiated this legal action will be under scrutiny, after Trump publicly expressed his wish to see his political opponents prosecuted and some of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's case, authorities seem to have followed protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the indictment seemed to have followed the standard process including the rules and standards within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's short, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "traditional" filing that "clearly outlines the particulars concerning the circumstances and circumstances here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably consistent with a series of precedents... where government officials improperly handled and transmitted sensitive information."